Got your attention, didn't I.
The title does relate to an actual story, kinda.
Back a while there was a story about the first dude in this state to get charged with animal cruelty for diddling the dog. It made it all over the news and internet and everything.
This was a brand new law in the state of Latteland. A while back a guy was killed because of an accident with a male horse while they were having sex, so our lawmakers found a safe cause to espouse. After all, who would object to a law that made it illegal to have sex with animals? Terrorism? World hunger? Presidential abuse of power? Bribery of elected officials? Too dangerous.
Mind you, I am not in favor of having sex with animals, other than the human kind.
I read the other day that the guy got off, er, was found innocent. There was no evidence, and the dog wouldn't testify.
His wife was the one that claimed to have caught him, and swore she had a picture on her cell phone, but when the time came, she was unable to produce any evidence. Seeing that the couple were in the middle of a bitter divorce, the court felt she may have had some other motivation than protecting Fifi from the bad, bad man.
They threw the case out of court.
I feel sorry for the poor guy. Whether he did or didn't diddle the dog, he will have been found guilty by a lot of people, regardless of his acquital.
"Do you remember John Doe?"
"Wasn't he the guy they caught diddling the dog?"
Something he will have following him the rest of his life.
3 comments:
Methinks a changing of names is in order.
If I remember correctly, wasn't that poor dog a Pit Bull?
And they say they're so vicious. I tell you what, if I'd have been that dog, they would've had to pry my jaws apart...and not in a good way either.
Grrrrr..........
No Celery:And maybe a change of location. Like to South America.
PQ: As I recall it WAS a pit Bull. Down girl! The opinion was that it never happened, the wife was just trying to make him look bad.
Post a Comment